BLOG‎ > ‎

Why the next Apple is likely to be an Asian start-up you’ve not even heard of yet

posted Nov 13, 2015, 10:33 AM by Ariel Koropitzer   [ updated Nov 17, 2015, 11:25 AM by David Khorram ]

Andrew Sheng says technological advances and other disruptive forces in the new economy have made it easier for small start-ups to take on the corporate giants – and beat them . Circuit design

        • Technicians at Chinese vaccine maker Sinovac Biotech in Wuhan. Improvements in technology and greater access to markets and capital are making it easier for small and medium-sized companies to grow into tomorrow’s behemoths. Photo: Reuters
Technicians at Chinese vaccine maker Sinovac Biotech in Wuhan. Improvements in technology and greater access to markets and capital are making it easier for small and medium-sized companies to grow into tomorrow’s behemoths. Photo: Reuters

Is big always good? How are the biggest companies in the world doing? Prior to the global financial crisis, it was always assumed that “big is better”. Companies from telecoms to supermarkets have tried to dominate global trade, especially in opening up new markets and putting in place global supply chains.

http://www.prototypedevelopment.best/free-technology-consult

In 2014, the Fortune Global 500 largest companies generated US$31.2 trillion in revenue, US$1.7 trillion in profits and employed 65 million people. But as Wal-Mart, the largest global retailer, signalled a profit warning, have global companies peaked as the world moves into secular stagnation?

Fortune magazine’s analysis of the Global 500 companies shows that, in the past decade, the geography of these companies has changed. The number of companies from advanced countries (the US, Europe and Japan) has shrunk from 452 out of 500 to 353. The big entrant is China (98 companies, compared with only 16 a decade ago). South Korea (17), Taiwan (8) and India (7) also have more global companies than 10 years ago.

Other than China, technology was the big disruptor. The newcomers that became big through technology, such as Apple, Google, Amazon, Visa and Facebook, have more market value per dollar of physical assets than older giants such as General Motors, Exxon and the like.

The third disruptor after technology is the post-crisis reforms in financial regulation. In a period of low interest rates, large companies made money from financing. GM, for example, made more money from car financing than from making cars. Once Dodd-Frank legislation threatened to make them financial holding companies, subject to many complex rules, these industrial giants decided to get out of the finance business.


A customer looks at products displayed during the opening day of an Apple shop in Dubai. Technology is the big disruptor in the new economy. Photo: AFP

Never have so many SMEs been able to access so much knowledge and so many markets with such speed and ease

Furthermore, the regulatory reforms also cut back on global bank profits by requiring large capital and liquidity increases and imposing huge compliance costs. Global banks are shrinking their balance sheets and lowering risk appetites to concentrate on where they have comparative advantage. At the same time, high regulatory costs and the constant need to increase transparency is causing many family-owned companies to rethink the benefits of going public.

Such disruptive forces mean competition is no longer coming from existing giants, but from minnows in emerging markets that are growing to become sharks, as the McKinsey Global Institute called it in its latest book, No Ordinary Disruption.




In China alone, there are roughly 40 million SMEs. From an investor point of
view, large-cap companies do not necessarily deliver superior returns compared with those with small caps. Photo: Xinhua

Who are the minnows threatening to be sharks? These are the small and medium-sized enterprises that have begun to access global markets through the internet. In China alone, there are roughly 40 million SMEs, so when the IPO window was temporarily closed after the A-share turmoil, thousands of start-ups queued to register on the third board, the over-the-counter market for transaction in unlisted company shares.

From an investor point of view, large-cap companies do not necessarily deliver superior returns compared with those with small caps. Indeed, the real returns come from nurturing start-ups to become unicorns (companies that are valued at more than US$1 billion), as private equity and angel funds have learnt to do.

There is, of course, some concern that even technology start-up valuations have become a bubble, but as long as investors are betting with their own money, rather than being leveraged, the systemic impact will not be that big.

My own bet is that the next Apple will be a start-up no one has heard of even five years ago. It will probably be in the biotechnology area, producing a new drug or medical tool that will change health care and medicine. It is more likely to come from Asia because of the massive efforts of Asian governments in fostering new entrepreneurship.

The reason is simply scale. Never have so many SMEs been able to access so much knowledge and so many markets with such speed and ease. The time of small companies in new markets is only just beginning.

Governments will do well to foster the ecosystem for innovation and change.

Posted From: http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/1878447/why-next-apple-likely-be-asian-start-youve-not-even-heard

Author: Andrew Sheng

isubTECH Corp.


11 Flora Spgs, Irvine, CA 92602 U.S.A. Corporate

https://goo.gl/maps/r5h9fddKeNH2



Phone:  
+1 714.731.8123


For Customer Support, please visit our help center